The New Rural Battlefield: Data Centers Come to Town
Rural America is becoming ground zero for the AI revolution. Not in the way you might think.
The United States has more than 3,000 operational data centers, with another 1,500 in some stage of development. Of the centers currently planned, 67 percent are headed for rural areas. That is a sharp reversal. Right now, 87 percent of existing data centers are in urban areas. The next wave is moving to the country (Pew Research Center, Most New Data Centers in the U.S. Are Coming to Rural Areas, April 2026).
The reason is straightforward. Data centers need three things in abundance: land, power, and water. Rural America has all three, and at a cost that makes corporate accountants smile. Virginia and Texas lead the country in planned facilities, with 287 and 170 respectively. Georgia follows with 141. The South and Midwest together are absorbing three-quarters of all planned construction (Pew Research Center, 2026).
But something else is happening that rarely makes the press releases. Communities are pushing back. And the pushback is bigger than most people realize.
The scale of opposition
Between May 2024 and March 2025, more than $64 billion in data center projects were delayed or canceled because of organized local opposition (Virginia Mercury, Report Highlights Community Pushback Stalling $64 Billion in Data Center Development, May 2025). A later Data Center Watch update found the number had grown to $152 billion in affected projects by late 2025, with hundreds of local opposition groups active across 42 states (Data Center Watch, Q3-Q4 2025 Insights Report).
This is not a handful of angry neighbors. It is a cross-demographic wave of resistance that spans political lines and educational backgrounds. A 2026 Pew Research Center survey found that more Americans say data centers have a negative effect on the environment, home energy costs, and quality of life nearby than say they have a positive effect. Only 25 percent say data centers are mostly good for local jobs (Pew Research Center, How Americans View Data Centers’ Impact, March 2026).
In Tucker County, West Virginia, residents put “No Data Center” signs in their windows (Brookings Institution, The Local Implications of Data Centers for Rural Communities, January 2026). In Brandy Station, Virginia, the planning commission unanimously denied a $12 billion project. In Jerome Township, Ohio, leaders imposed a nine-month moratorium on new data center development to reassess siting criteria (WOSU, Jerome Township Puts Pause on New Data Center Development, September 2025). In Stokes County, North Carolina, Indigenous leaders and environmental groups fought a data center project that threatened burial grounds, cultural sites, and the Dan River corridor (Southern Environmental Law Center, A Rural Community Steps Up to Stop Data Centers, 2025).
The pattern repeats across the Midwest and South. A company arrives with promises. A community starts asking questions. The questions are not irrational. They are rooted in specific, documented concerns.
Water
A single large data center can consume millions of gallons of water per day for cooling. In Texas, data centers are projected to use 49 billion gallons of water in 2025, a figure that could reach 399 billion gallons by 2030 (Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Data Drain: The Land and Water Impacts of the AI Boom, 2026). That is enough to draw down the state’s largest reservoir. A Bloomberg News analysis found that roughly two-thirds of data centers built since 2022 have been located in water-stressed regions.
For rural communities where agriculture depends on reliable water and where drought is not an abstraction, this is not a theoretical concern. It is a practical one that shows up at the kitchen table.
Power
These facilities draw enormous amounts of electricity. A typical hyperscale data center can use as much power as 100,000 homes (Consumer Reports, AI Data Centers: Big Tech’s Impact on Electric Bills, Water, and More, 2025). In some states, ratepayers have seen their bills climb to subsidize the transmission infrastructure required to hook up a data center. Utility customers in seven PJM Interconnection states were charged $4.4 billion for data center transmission upgrades approved in 2025 (Utility Dive, Customers in 7 PJM States Paid $4.4B for Data Center Transmission Upgrades, 2025).
A November 2025 Consumer Reports survey found that 78 percent of Americans are at least somewhat concerned that new data centers will raise their energy bills. In rural areas, where incomes are lower and energy costs already consume a larger share of household budgets, this concern is especially acute.
Jobs
A typical large data center employs between 30 and 200 permanent workers. An average retail data center using two to five megawatts employs about 30 permanent workers. Hyperscale facilities may reach 150 (Quartz, AI Data Centers Employ Very Few People, 2025). Construction jobs number in the hundreds but last only 18 to 30 months, and many go to out-of-state specialized contractors (Hamm Institute, Data Center Employment Forecast Analysis, 2025).
Permanent technical roles frequently go to in-migrants, not existing residents. Without intentional local investment in training, the higher-paying engineering and IT positions fill from outside the community. The Brookings-AEI Commission on Rural Prosperity found that rural communities frequently lack the staffing and expertise to evaluate data center proposals on their technical merits, which makes informed local decision-making harder (Brookings Institution, 2026).
None of this means data centers are inherently harmful. Rural communities need economic development. Some of these projects will bring genuine benefit. But the cost-benefit calculation is more complicated than the brochures suggest, and communities are right to demand honest answers.
What this means for rural churches
Pastors in rural communities are navigating something most leadership books do not cover. The congregation includes people on every side of this issue. Some see the data center as economic salvation. Some see it as cultural destruction. Some are genuinely unsure. Almost everyone has opinions shaped by Facebook, not by the actual project documents.
The church cannot make these divides disappear. But it can choose whether it makes them worse. That starts with learning the actual facts of the project, not the social media version. It means reading the proposal, talking to people on all sides, and being honest about what is known and what is not.
The Rural Assembly offers a webinar series and practical guides for rural communities navigating data center development (Rural Assembly, What Rural Communities Need to Know About Data Centers, 2026). The National Wildlife Federation’s Environmental Justice program has resources on community engagement with industrial development (National Wildlife Federation, The AI Data Center Boom Is an Environmental Justice Crisis, May 2026).
Frequently asked questions
Should my church take a position on the data center?
Not right away. The church’s first job is to help people think clearly, not to pick a side. Gather the facts. Read the actual project proposal. Talk to people on all sides. Then decide if a pastoral word is needed.
What if members of my congregation are on opposite sides?
That is normal. It is also an opportunity. The church is one of the few places in rural America where people with different views still sit in the same room on Sunday morning. Protect that space.
How do I talk about this when I do not fully understand the technology?
Start with what you do know. You know your community. You know the people who will be affected. You know what water and land mean in your context. The technical details matter, but they are not the starting point.
What comes next
This is the first in a five-part series. The next post looks at who actually wins and who actually loses when a data center arrives. After that: what it means for rural churches, the five dynamics that shape how different communities respond, and what faith communities can do when technological change lands in the parking lot.
Sources
- Pew Research Center — More Americans Say Data Centers Have a Negative Effect on the Environment (April 2026)
- Pew Research Center — Older Americans More Likely to Be Very Concerned About AI (March 2026)
- Virginia Mercury — Virginia’s Data Center Boom: Costing Billions (May 2025)
- Data Center Watch — datacenterwatch.org (2025-2026 reporting)
- Brookings Institution — Rural Communities, Data Centers, and the New Digital Economy (January 2026)
- Lincoln Institute of Land Policy — Data Centers and Rural Land Use (2026)
- Consumer Reports — Data Center Boom Raising Energy Costs for Communities (2025)
- Utility Dive — Rural utilities navigate surging data center electricity demand (2025)
- Quartz — Why Rural America Is the New Frontier for Data Centers (2025)
- Hamm Institute — Rural Data Centers: Economic Promise and Community Cost (2025)
- WOSU — Ohio Rural Communities Grapple With Data Center Water Usage (September 2025)
- Southern Environmental Law Center — Data Centers and Environmental Justice in Rural Communities (2025)
- National Wildlife Federation — The AI Data Center Boom Is an Environmental Justice Crisis (May 2026)
- Rural Assembly — Data Centers and Rural America (2026)
All links verified June 2026.
Series: AI Infrastructure and Rural America
A five-part series on what data centers and AI infrastructure mean for rural communities.
- The New Rural Battlefield: Data Centers Come to Town (this post)
- Who Wins, Who Loses? The Divides That AI Infrastructure Exposes
- When the Cloud Lands in the Church Parking Lot
- The Five Dynamics: Why Rural Communities Respond Differently
- The Rural Church and the Data Center
